Monday, February 25, 2013

The One Where I Have a Meltdown

I would like to preface this by saying that I feel like I've done a good job up until now of holding my shit together. I mean, I'm in a new place, away from all my friends and family with no idea of when I will see them again, I'm in a new job with an indefinite future and indefinite professional prospects, living with a bunch of people that I can't be completely comfortable around and who are fairly transient so as to not inspire horrible amount of confiding confidence, and I'm realizing more and more that I'm also in a transient phase - in theory this if just a gap year, between when I graduated and when I go back and get my Master's degree.

So why the hell did I move out here?

One of my friends tried to say that we get a sense of fulfillment just by surviving out here, that making it day to day is a victory. But I don't feel that way. I want to go lay out by the lake and eat pineapple and get tan and run through the mountains. I want to stay up late and have stimulating conversations. I want to be the recipient of a hug that drains the unhappiness from me and makes me feel secure and like I don't have to be strong. I want to snuggle someone while I watch a movie and not worry about if they're comfortable with it or if they're reading into it more than they should or that they're not enjoying the movie. I just want to be happy with someone and be fulfilled by them. And this isn't even romantic. I just crave companionship. I have no one out here who makes me happy enough. No one that doesn't leave me feeling wanting - the missing parts are more apparent than the parts that are fulfilled.

I miss my Ex. I hate that fact and I hate admitting it. So much. I feel so weak when I say it, like one of those battered women that don't realize how poisonous their relationships are. But I miss that he and I were so comfortable together. That we had so much fun and he cared about me and my future and that he was willing to sit and listen to me and help me understand what I was thinking and feeling and that he knew me so well. He honestly knew so much about me - I showed him some of my deepest fears and insecurities and he accepted that and he loved me. Unfortunately, that last part is what allowed him to manipulate me the way I did. I realize he did it only to avoid his own guilt and to side-step the fear he was feeling. But still. I trusted him and he abused that. Yet he made me happy in ways that I didn't know I could be happy. He gave me the thought that I could be that happy with one person. Now I don't even have a conglomerate of people nearby that can make me that happy. Where I was 4 months ago, I did. In fact, the conglomerate of people I had around me made me happier than I was with the Ex.

So here I sit, financially strapped, professionally unfulfilled, and personally and emotionally starved. There's no real end in sight here. I'm just...existing. Floating. Aimless. Wandering. Torn between different possibilities and unsure of what I'm supposed to be doing or where I'm supposed to go. I'm 25 and have no discernible end goal or plan on how to get there. I vacillate between emptiness and anxiety. Sometimes with a little peppering of failure.

I don't know. I'm unsure of what my life will look like in a few months or where I'll be. I'm not even sure what I will be doing in the next 4 weeks.

I'm just trying to make it through without losing it and ruining any political ambitions I might have later on in life. I don't know. I'm just...meh

I'm done.

PM out.

Saturday, February 16, 2013

The one where I waste a whole day...

So I'm watching Pitch Perfect for about the millionth time right now rather than working/studying/cleaning/showering/etc. I guess it's a good thing there's nothing on Monday so I can play catch-up. I don't anticipate any shifts in my motivational trend in the near future. If it's any excuse, I'm pretty sure I'm PMSing, because I'm majorly tearing up during the Bellas' final song.

Side note, why are the guys that sing "The Final Countdown" wearing weird bathrobes? Am I missing a joke there?


I don't honestly have that much to say, but I've been such a failure at blogging since I've been home that I felt compelled to write something. I do think I could use some advice...

I need money. I'm burning through my savings at a slightly alarming rate and I just don't work enough to bring home the bacon. It's not that I can't get research hours - there's plenty to do - it's just that when my job feels a lot like school, it's hard to prioritize my job over homework/exams that have more definite deadlines. Suggestions? Times like these I really miss being a TA, where office hours generally meant doing homework and answering the question of the occasional student.

And I know the holiday is technically over, but I thought these were pretty brilliant on the RNC's part - gopvalentine.com

Love you ladies.

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

The One Where I Get Into a Facebook Smackdown


So this is what happened today. I went to bed after teasing one of my friends for a status update and this is what I woke up to. My last comment was just barely added.

Thoughts on the situation? Was I really that out of line and offensive?


MWS:
SOTU (eye roll).

  • MS In all fairness... I didn't care to watch or listen.
    8 hours ago via mobile · Like · 1

  • Paul Mitchell:  Oh my gosh. You are not allowed to eye roll as you did not watch or listen.  Just as bad as those people who complain about the state of politics and don't vote...
    8 hours ago via mobile · Like · 1

  • DW ^ That's like saying that people who don't take drugs can't comment on whether or not to make them illegal.

  • Paul Mitchell: 
    No, it would be like people who don't take drugs complaining about how drugs are horrible and SHOULD be illegal - but not doing anything about it.
    8 hours ago via mobile · Like

  • MS: 
    I've heard plenty from the twitter verse and FB world. He isn't a leader if American principles. Complain all you want, I'm confidant I've done more than vote.
    8 hours ago via mobile · Like · 1

  • Paul Mitchell: 
    I could even go for people who don't do drugs and don't care to learn at all about drugs - including the negatives of them - and then saying they should be illegal. Or saying any number of things should be illegal like gay marriage or guns without being educated as to why. All similar.
    8 hours ago via mobile · Like

  • MS: 
    Really? You have no effing idea who I am, what I know, sacrifices I've made.
    8 hours ago via mobile · Like · 1

  • MS 
    I can do, think or say whatever the heck I want. God Bless America and the First Amendment!
    8 hours ago via mobile · Like

  • JH 
    well I think you can not listen and still have the same opinion. He does the same thing with each speech. He talks in broad strokes, make lots of promises he can't keep and blames everyone else for the troubles we have. His solution is also always the same. Government can and should help solve all of the challenges in our lives..and nothing of what he promises will get anywhere. Remember the Health care speech. When given even if you combined all plans on the table, they did not do what he said they would and what was passed looks nothing like what he promised. Only want to raise taxes on the rich but raises them for all cause he robbed Social Security a year before. than says we have to avoid spending cuts after his large tax increase just last month and the way to be responsible is not to cut spending, but now he wants tax reform to close tax loopholes and do what as a result...that's right raise taxes. Same story different day.
    8 hours ago · Unlike · 3

  • MWS: 
    Paul Mitchell, I too don't ever deserve to be compared to someone who complains and does nothing. I have worked on campaigns since I was 16. The truth is that I have sat through Pres. Obama's addresses, his comments, his debates, and I have even read most of his book, "The Audacity of Hope," and I merely cannot take it anymore. The man is not serious about leading, he never has been, and all indicators that I have lead me to believe the he won't improve in his second term. I could go on and on, but suffice it to say, unlike Chris Matthews, I don't get a chill that runs up my leg when the Pres. speaks. No, for me, whatever Pres. Obama says is irrelevant next to his actions, and his SOTU will not change in anyway his failures as President since January 20, 2009.
    7 hours ago · Like · 4

  • MS: 
    Amen, MSW! Amen and Amen!!!!!
    7 hours ago via mobile · Like · 1

  • MS 
    On the illegal drug issue. Are you a avid drug user? Marijuana? That may explain things.
    7 hours ago via mobile · Like

  • Michelle - you're really bringing some good issues and lucid arguments to the table. I'm shocked that Jillian isn't chomping at the bit to talk with you.
    7 hours ago via mobile · Like

  • ASB 
    MWS, I'm not sure it's fair to say a man whose taken the trouble to run for and win 2 presidential elections is not serious about leading. He just has a different vision of America than you. He's leading it in a direction you're not happy with, that's okay for you to disagree with that, but don't say he isn't serious or working hard to lead for a vision of America that he believes in. I don't necessarily agree with him either (on a lot of things), but your language seems pretty harsh and ad hominem when there are plenty of substantive issues to focus criticism on. I mean even if you agree with his vision/grand statements there's criticism for the fact that his strategy has been flawed and he's been poor at managing the politics (especially with congress). But I'd certainly say he's serious about leading...just maybe not the best at it...and maybe not leading where I'd like him to.
    5 hours ago · Like · 1

  • Paul Mitchell:

     Wow. Clearly some people are feeling a little aggressive and jumping to all sorts of conclusions. 

    First off, MS, I never actually addressed any of my comments to you, so I'm sorry that you chose to be offended by them and in turn attempt to att
    ack me personally. And you're right, you can think or say whatever you want. If you go back and look, you'll see I never said you couldn't, just like I never said you were an irresponsible citizen for not voting. But keep in mind that, likewise, you know nothing about me other than that I'm friends with a few of your friends on Facebook and have a great sense of humor (that is, assuming you read my quote page. Some of those are quite funny.) However, I'm not going to hold this against you. You obviously care a great deal about things. Great. I do too. And believe it or not, our beliefs are probably quite similar. So how about you stop attacking me and take a bit out of the other guy?

    JH, I actually have a lot of respect for you and what you said as well. And I agree, in many ways, the speech was more of the same (though I must say I personally enjoyed the head nods to states rights he threw in while talking about Head Start). However, you KNOW that because you listened to it. Yes, you could come to that same assumption based on past speeches, however, having watched it and listened to it you actually know that it was. Your thoughts on the speech were based on an interpretation of the actual text as opposed to interpretation of previous texts or someone else's interpretation. And as I learned from my "liberal education" received at BYU, primary sources are always better than secondary sources, just as the source is always a better indicator of what the source says than what came before or after. Yes, you can extrapolate and assume, but why would you when you have the source readily available? As the aforementioned Facebook post is about THIS SOTU I'll put more weight in a persons' opinion who actually watched it as opposed to didn't - even if that person has a lot of background reading and previous experience. I feel like doing so is like it's vocally complaining about the local branch of a chain restaurant just because you didn't like the other locations. You can choose not to eat there, you may choose to tell some friends not to eat there, but you shouldn't act as an authority on how horrible this specific location is when you've never actually stepped foot in it or put their food in your mouth. (There I go again with the analogies. Please don't think I'm comparing you to uneducated food critics now.)

    MWS, I'm not sure exactly where to start, though I will say I have a huge desire to push you off your soapbox to stop your chest-thumping. You waving your CV at me is not going to change what I said, mostly because I've seen it already. I expect more from you as a political peer and a close friend. What I posted was simply poking fun at you (hence the  face), not all that different than what I said and did last night when you were over at my house and I was watching the SOTU. For you to suddenly get offended is a little baffling. I can handle this kind of misinterpretation from someone who doesn't know me at all, but from someone I've spent hours talking with about political issues and otherwise, it's a little bit more difficult to shrug off. If you feel like we need more clarification on this issue, text or call me. Or we can talk about it tonight before dinner. Okay?

    Thank you all for weighing in. I hope each and every one of you has a fabulous day.

Thursday, February 7, 2013

The One Where I Talk About Gun Control


*dun, dun dun!!* 

There is one thing every Hill staffer knows – brace yourselves when Fox or MSNBC start using certain buzzwords. These buzzwords include amnesty, gun control, impeachment, treason, war on women, rape, voter fraud, immigration, conspiracy, Constitution, rights, attacks on the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 14th, amendments etc. When we hear these things, we as staffers man the shutters, screen our calls, and try and send the interns on as few errands as possible so someone besides me will be free to pick up the phone for the umpteenth time that day.

This round of gun control will be no different.

It’s interesting. I can tell what each major news channel is saying based on the things the constituents say back to me. For example, what I hear the most of now is how Obama is going to “take our machine guns” as if President Obama himself, robed in a black suit, black tie, and the dead of night is going to get in to his black Ford Escalade and watch as Federal Agents slip stealthily over state borders, thereby rounding-up and confiscating all guns - and possibly bows and arrows - while innocent citizens huddle together, quaking in their nightclothes, powerless to do anything as they are stripped of the only thing that will protect them from the physical threats they are (apparently) constantly endangered by. 

I, clearly, find this ridiculous. Mostly because I listened to President Obama’s address as opposed to hearing soundbites and interpretations of it on one of the (especially skewed) cable news networks.

I can also tell which side of the aisle is playing the most defense by who is calling me the most. In this case it’s conservatives. Though it really does change depending on the issue. When voter registration issues arise though, it tends to be liberals who call me more. Their rights are being infringed on! As if some cigar-chomping Republican is sitting by the voter line in a $5,000 suit, pointing his goons at any Latino/women/African-American who will vote for the opposition candidate. The goons, of course, will then take their military-style AK-47s and intimidate said minority into leaving the voting line. (By the way, there are bigger concerns with voting than just voter ID people. But that’s a blog for another time.)

Oddly enough, in both of these cases, their inflammatory cry is the same: “THIS IS MY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT!! MY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ARE BEING INFRINGED UPON!!!”

And it’s true. In both cases. At least in my opinion (which is solely my opinion and not influenced by any policymaker. Nor does it reflect the views of any professor or politician I have worked for, been associated with, or have associated with in any social media outlet. Heck. I don’t think it even reflects the views of my parents.)


You’re right. The right to vote is a right given to all citizens in the Constitution. As long as they’re over 18. And you’re right as well. The 2nd Amendment does discuss the right to bear and keep arms. Of course at that time they’d never even imagined a weapon that could discharge more than one bullet at a time, but whatever.

So why don’t we link the two issues together? Liberals want looser voter regulations, conservatives want looser gun regulations. Both are rights guaranteed in the Constitution and both are rights we've been forced to regulate as time as shown a handful of citizens cannot be trusted to use those rights correctly, to the harm of others.

For example – conservatives want a national voting database. Great. I say do it. But we’ll have a national gun registry as well. Most places already have a statewide voter data base, so at the very least, a person should be forced to re-register their gun with the state whenever they change states/cities. If a person wants to exercise their Constitutional right to own a gun they’ll have to register it, just like a person has to register to exercise their Constitutional right to vote.

Likewise, liberals want background checks and waiting periods before people are allowed to purchase a gun. Great. But let’s put in mandatory pre-registration deadlines for all people registering to vote. And also let’s have an ID requirement as well, since that’s a less stringent version of a background check. I’d even be all for lowering the price of ID cards, or allowing each person to receive one free ID card upon their 18th birthday, just as long as they follow the regular protocol for identification. And yes, some citizens may slip through the cracks of this process and be denied their right to vote, but requiring mental health checks may deny some people who will do absolutely no harm to others the right to protect themselves - something the 2nd amendment was meant for as well. 

The fact is, the best way to avoid mass-shootings as well as voter-ID-fraud will be to educate people. Educate people to love people with mental disabilities, not to alienate them and create situations where a mass-shooting seems like the truly logical option. Educate people about how important it is to vote, and vote responsibly as well as what proper voting protocol should be like so they can't be duped. There are always going to be people who want to abuse the rights we have. And  yes, where our rights begin is where someone else's rights end. So sometimes protecting our rights means we have to sacrifice a little and give up something we believe to accommodate what we believe is equally important.

Take it or leave it, our rights are our rights. Whether it's guns, life, or voting, what applies to one should apply to the other. No right should be more important than any other.

And so it goes. I will keep avoiding the phone, and then nodding and making sympathetic noises when it can't be avoided and the person on the other line quotes either Sean Hannity or Rachel Maddow. And I will bite my tongue. Because not everyone is as forward thinking as we are.

-Paul Mitchell