Wednesday, February 13, 2013

The One Where I Get Into a Facebook Smackdown


So this is what happened today. I went to bed after teasing one of my friends for a status update and this is what I woke up to. My last comment was just barely added.

Thoughts on the situation? Was I really that out of line and offensive?


MWS:
SOTU (eye roll).

  • MS In all fairness... I didn't care to watch or listen.
    8 hours ago via mobile · Like · 1

  • Paul Mitchell:  Oh my gosh. You are not allowed to eye roll as you did not watch or listen.  Just as bad as those people who complain about the state of politics and don't vote...
    8 hours ago via mobile · Like · 1

  • DW ^ That's like saying that people who don't take drugs can't comment on whether or not to make them illegal.

  • Paul Mitchell: 
    No, it would be like people who don't take drugs complaining about how drugs are horrible and SHOULD be illegal - but not doing anything about it.
    8 hours ago via mobile · Like

  • MS: 
    I've heard plenty from the twitter verse and FB world. He isn't a leader if American principles. Complain all you want, I'm confidant I've done more than vote.
    8 hours ago via mobile · Like · 1

  • Paul Mitchell: 
    I could even go for people who don't do drugs and don't care to learn at all about drugs - including the negatives of them - and then saying they should be illegal. Or saying any number of things should be illegal like gay marriage or guns without being educated as to why. All similar.
    8 hours ago via mobile · Like

  • MS: 
    Really? You have no effing idea who I am, what I know, sacrifices I've made.
    8 hours ago via mobile · Like · 1

  • MS 
    I can do, think or say whatever the heck I want. God Bless America and the First Amendment!
    8 hours ago via mobile · Like

  • JH 
    well I think you can not listen and still have the same opinion. He does the same thing with each speech. He talks in broad strokes, make lots of promises he can't keep and blames everyone else for the troubles we have. His solution is also always the same. Government can and should help solve all of the challenges in our lives..and nothing of what he promises will get anywhere. Remember the Health care speech. When given even if you combined all plans on the table, they did not do what he said they would and what was passed looks nothing like what he promised. Only want to raise taxes on the rich but raises them for all cause he robbed Social Security a year before. than says we have to avoid spending cuts after his large tax increase just last month and the way to be responsible is not to cut spending, but now he wants tax reform to close tax loopholes and do what as a result...that's right raise taxes. Same story different day.
    8 hours ago · Unlike · 3

  • MWS: 
    Paul Mitchell, I too don't ever deserve to be compared to someone who complains and does nothing. I have worked on campaigns since I was 16. The truth is that I have sat through Pres. Obama's addresses, his comments, his debates, and I have even read most of his book, "The Audacity of Hope," and I merely cannot take it anymore. The man is not serious about leading, he never has been, and all indicators that I have lead me to believe the he won't improve in his second term. I could go on and on, but suffice it to say, unlike Chris Matthews, I don't get a chill that runs up my leg when the Pres. speaks. No, for me, whatever Pres. Obama says is irrelevant next to his actions, and his SOTU will not change in anyway his failures as President since January 20, 2009.
    7 hours ago · Like · 4

  • MS: 
    Amen, MSW! Amen and Amen!!!!!
    7 hours ago via mobile · Like · 1

  • MS 
    On the illegal drug issue. Are you a avid drug user? Marijuana? That may explain things.
    7 hours ago via mobile · Like

  • Michelle - you're really bringing some good issues and lucid arguments to the table. I'm shocked that Jillian isn't chomping at the bit to talk with you.
    7 hours ago via mobile · Like

  • ASB 
    MWS, I'm not sure it's fair to say a man whose taken the trouble to run for and win 2 presidential elections is not serious about leading. He just has a different vision of America than you. He's leading it in a direction you're not happy with, that's okay for you to disagree with that, but don't say he isn't serious or working hard to lead for a vision of America that he believes in. I don't necessarily agree with him either (on a lot of things), but your language seems pretty harsh and ad hominem when there are plenty of substantive issues to focus criticism on. I mean even if you agree with his vision/grand statements there's criticism for the fact that his strategy has been flawed and he's been poor at managing the politics (especially with congress). But I'd certainly say he's serious about leading...just maybe not the best at it...and maybe not leading where I'd like him to.
    5 hours ago · Like · 1

  • Paul Mitchell:

     Wow. Clearly some people are feeling a little aggressive and jumping to all sorts of conclusions. 

    First off, MS, I never actually addressed any of my comments to you, so I'm sorry that you chose to be offended by them and in turn attempt to att
    ack me personally. And you're right, you can think or say whatever you want. If you go back and look, you'll see I never said you couldn't, just like I never said you were an irresponsible citizen for not voting. But keep in mind that, likewise, you know nothing about me other than that I'm friends with a few of your friends on Facebook and have a great sense of humor (that is, assuming you read my quote page. Some of those are quite funny.) However, I'm not going to hold this against you. You obviously care a great deal about things. Great. I do too. And believe it or not, our beliefs are probably quite similar. So how about you stop attacking me and take a bit out of the other guy?

    JH, I actually have a lot of respect for you and what you said as well. And I agree, in many ways, the speech was more of the same (though I must say I personally enjoyed the head nods to states rights he threw in while talking about Head Start). However, you KNOW that because you listened to it. Yes, you could come to that same assumption based on past speeches, however, having watched it and listened to it you actually know that it was. Your thoughts on the speech were based on an interpretation of the actual text as opposed to interpretation of previous texts or someone else's interpretation. And as I learned from my "liberal education" received at BYU, primary sources are always better than secondary sources, just as the source is always a better indicator of what the source says than what came before or after. Yes, you can extrapolate and assume, but why would you when you have the source readily available? As the aforementioned Facebook post is about THIS SOTU I'll put more weight in a persons' opinion who actually watched it as opposed to didn't - even if that person has a lot of background reading and previous experience. I feel like doing so is like it's vocally complaining about the local branch of a chain restaurant just because you didn't like the other locations. You can choose not to eat there, you may choose to tell some friends not to eat there, but you shouldn't act as an authority on how horrible this specific location is when you've never actually stepped foot in it or put their food in your mouth. (There I go again with the analogies. Please don't think I'm comparing you to uneducated food critics now.)

    MWS, I'm not sure exactly where to start, though I will say I have a huge desire to push you off your soapbox to stop your chest-thumping. You waving your CV at me is not going to change what I said, mostly because I've seen it already. I expect more from you as a political peer and a close friend. What I posted was simply poking fun at you (hence the  face), not all that different than what I said and did last night when you were over at my house and I was watching the SOTU. For you to suddenly get offended is a little baffling. I can handle this kind of misinterpretation from someone who doesn't know me at all, but from someone I've spent hours talking with about political issues and otherwise, it's a little bit more difficult to shrug off. If you feel like we need more clarification on this issue, text or call me. Or we can talk about it tonight before dinner. Okay?

    Thank you all for weighing in. I hope each and every one of you has a fabulous day.

Thursday, February 7, 2013

The One Where I Talk About Gun Control


*dun, dun dun!!* 

There is one thing every Hill staffer knows – brace yourselves when Fox or MSNBC start using certain buzzwords. These buzzwords include amnesty, gun control, impeachment, treason, war on women, rape, voter fraud, immigration, conspiracy, Constitution, rights, attacks on the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 14th, amendments etc. When we hear these things, we as staffers man the shutters, screen our calls, and try and send the interns on as few errands as possible so someone besides me will be free to pick up the phone for the umpteenth time that day.

This round of gun control will be no different.

It’s interesting. I can tell what each major news channel is saying based on the things the constituents say back to me. For example, what I hear the most of now is how Obama is going to “take our machine guns” as if President Obama himself, robed in a black suit, black tie, and the dead of night is going to get in to his black Ford Escalade and watch as Federal Agents slip stealthily over state borders, thereby rounding-up and confiscating all guns - and possibly bows and arrows - while innocent citizens huddle together, quaking in their nightclothes, powerless to do anything as they are stripped of the only thing that will protect them from the physical threats they are (apparently) constantly endangered by. 

I, clearly, find this ridiculous. Mostly because I listened to President Obama’s address as opposed to hearing soundbites and interpretations of it on one of the (especially skewed) cable news networks.

I can also tell which side of the aisle is playing the most defense by who is calling me the most. In this case it’s conservatives. Though it really does change depending on the issue. When voter registration issues arise though, it tends to be liberals who call me more. Their rights are being infringed on! As if some cigar-chomping Republican is sitting by the voter line in a $5,000 suit, pointing his goons at any Latino/women/African-American who will vote for the opposition candidate. The goons, of course, will then take their military-style AK-47s and intimidate said minority into leaving the voting line. (By the way, there are bigger concerns with voting than just voter ID people. But that’s a blog for another time.)

Oddly enough, in both of these cases, their inflammatory cry is the same: “THIS IS MY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT!! MY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ARE BEING INFRINGED UPON!!!”

And it’s true. In both cases. At least in my opinion (which is solely my opinion and not influenced by any policymaker. Nor does it reflect the views of any professor or politician I have worked for, been associated with, or have associated with in any social media outlet. Heck. I don’t think it even reflects the views of my parents.)


You’re right. The right to vote is a right given to all citizens in the Constitution. As long as they’re over 18. And you’re right as well. The 2nd Amendment does discuss the right to bear and keep arms. Of course at that time they’d never even imagined a weapon that could discharge more than one bullet at a time, but whatever.

So why don’t we link the two issues together? Liberals want looser voter regulations, conservatives want looser gun regulations. Both are rights guaranteed in the Constitution and both are rights we've been forced to regulate as time as shown a handful of citizens cannot be trusted to use those rights correctly, to the harm of others.

For example – conservatives want a national voting database. Great. I say do it. But we’ll have a national gun registry as well. Most places already have a statewide voter data base, so at the very least, a person should be forced to re-register their gun with the state whenever they change states/cities. If a person wants to exercise their Constitutional right to own a gun they’ll have to register it, just like a person has to register to exercise their Constitutional right to vote.

Likewise, liberals want background checks and waiting periods before people are allowed to purchase a gun. Great. But let’s put in mandatory pre-registration deadlines for all people registering to vote. And also let’s have an ID requirement as well, since that’s a less stringent version of a background check. I’d even be all for lowering the price of ID cards, or allowing each person to receive one free ID card upon their 18th birthday, just as long as they follow the regular protocol for identification. And yes, some citizens may slip through the cracks of this process and be denied their right to vote, but requiring mental health checks may deny some people who will do absolutely no harm to others the right to protect themselves - something the 2nd amendment was meant for as well. 

The fact is, the best way to avoid mass-shootings as well as voter-ID-fraud will be to educate people. Educate people to love people with mental disabilities, not to alienate them and create situations where a mass-shooting seems like the truly logical option. Educate people about how important it is to vote, and vote responsibly as well as what proper voting protocol should be like so they can't be duped. There are always going to be people who want to abuse the rights we have. And  yes, where our rights begin is where someone else's rights end. So sometimes protecting our rights means we have to sacrifice a little and give up something we believe to accommodate what we believe is equally important.

Take it or leave it, our rights are our rights. Whether it's guns, life, or voting, what applies to one should apply to the other. No right should be more important than any other.

And so it goes. I will keep avoiding the phone, and then nodding and making sympathetic noises when it can't be avoided and the person on the other line quotes either Sean Hannity or Rachel Maddow. And I will bite my tongue. Because not everyone is as forward thinking as we are.

-Paul Mitchell

Thursday, January 31, 2013

The one where I blog for no reason


So here I sit, in my office, minding my own business. I have no idea why I felt compelled to blog, I just do.

First of all, I LOVED talking to you ladies on Sunday. I seriously think we need to make that a bi-weekly thing at the least. I know doing it more often would be hard with our schedules, but I feel like twice a month is about as little as I can see and talk to you guys without going insane. Plus, so much happens in a week that I know there will be things I forget to tell you if we don’t do it that often. And heaven knows we don’t want that to happen J

So I’m having my ovulation feelings for Guru. I’ve realized that’s what it is. Whenever I’m ovulating I develop these feelings that are very much like a crush. Yet there’s still the logical part of me that retains enough control to remind myself that I don’t want to date him. Eventually the hormones calm down and everything returns to normal. But this week is always a little weird. Plus we’re trying to figure out exactly what our relationship is out here, I think. There are certain days we’ll plan to meet up at the metro together, but it’s not an everyday thing. Likewise, I don’t know whether to plan to meet up and walk back to the metro/metro home together after work. We get off the same time and sometimes we do. Or like what we did yesterday where we did this test to see if he could leave from Union Station and I could leave from Federal Center SW and we tried to end up on the same train. We did. It was fun. However, it’s sporadic. I don’t do well with sporadic. I like my pattern and my routine. Oh well. It’s all going to change in a week when he only works every other day at the Senate.

Oh, and in case you’re wondering how the conversation went with he and I, it went well. Before I was able to launch in to my schpeel he interrupted me to apologize and kind of explain why he was acting the way he was as well. We ended up talking and we’re good now. Clearly. As you can see from the hormone problems.

But speaking of ovulation, it makes me love men. Like, really love men. I want to kiss and love them. Okay, maybe not them, but at least one. Possibly two. Or three. I’m not picky.

I’m driving to Pennsylvania this weekend! Me and my roommates (and I think some friends) are all loading in to our cars and going to watch the groundhog to see if he sees his shadow.  Afterwards we’re going to the Hershey factory.  I’m sure I will have lots of stories and pictures to share with you when I get back.

I’m going to peace out. It’s time for the end of the day run away. I’m contemplating rewarding myself with a cupcake from Baked and Wired. So good…

Sunday, January 27, 2013

The one with the verbal bitch slap



Ladies... it's time to unite. We have a serious problem on our hands. We must find a way to make a difference concerning what I am about to share with you. It's our sacred calling as women, especially women with the gospel. It's time we start educating. 

Back story: Read this short post that my friend shared on facebook. Click here 

My friend asked for thoughts and opinions. All the girls that posted said awesome things ... and then a guy chimed in and I had to set him straight. Here are the comments. 


THE BYUI STUDENT: A friend in college tried to make me feel like I was exposing myself for wearing my purse across my chest in college. I think men who say these things don't see how backward it is and we--men and women who DO see the harm--need to communicate it in the moment as kindly, clearly, and often as possible.


THE DUDE:  Newark New Jersey is the car theft capital of America.
The Honda Accord is the most stolen car in America.
If someone drives into downtown Newark in a Honda Accord, parks the car, leaves the key in the ignition, leaves the doors wide open, and turns on the flashers (no pun intended), and walks away, what are the chances of that car getting stolen?

I can imagine the police officer saying something as follows:
"What were you thinking?"
"Why were you there in the first place?"

To which the driver responds, "Whoah! Wait a minute! Are you blaming ME?? Shouldn't we be teaching people NOT to steal cars?? Just because I leave my keys in the car, doesn't mean I'm inviting someone to steal it!!!"

Should people steal cars? NO
Should we teach people not to steal cars? YES
Should the police man shame the driver? No, he probably should have said something like "Oh, I am really sorry your car was stolen, that is terrible! ... (but really what were you thinking)"

....

So in response to the article.

The next time you ladies are leaning back in a chair, and a guy walks out of the room and someone informs you that the man refuses to come back in until you sit upright, please respond: "I'm sitting in a chair, you tell that man that he can stay outside as long as he likes. ... Also tell him NOT to come in until he can look at people properly."

However if you walk into downtown Newark in a mini-skirt... I'll let you explain that one to the police yourself.


THE CONFUSED GIRL: Since I've never lived in a oppressive male dominated society, I just don't get it. I live in an oppressive female society where males are superfluous and expected to be eunuchs and women are supposed to look like centerfolds and be treated like brain surgeons.


GNC's Response to the Dude: I have to say with all due respect to Marshall that I completely disagree. Your comment is a contraction and reveals a point that when discussing such topics people often miss. There is no difference between the girl sitting in the chair and the girl walking in Newark (or anywhere for that matter) in a mini-skirt. Just as the young lady was blamed for "seducing" the middle aged man, your comparison blames the girl in the mini-skirt for what she "has to explain to the police." And frankly, your comment about "letting you explain that one to the police yourself" is extremely offensive. Essentially the comparison made blames the girl in the mini-skirt. Here is the thing about rape (or any type of sexual assault), often times it is not about the sex. It's about power; it's about domination; it's a result of thousands of years of hierarchical gender roles that place men above women instead of next to them as equal partners. And when I say equal I do not mean the same. Men and women are different. They have different roles, strengths, weaknesses, and talents. It is only when men and women respect each other and work next to each other instead of one gender dominating the other that this world moves forward in a positive direction. A women should be able to walk around in whatever she wants to wear and be safe, regardless of location. It wasn't the mini-skirt, the location, or the girl that caused her to have to "explain that one to the police herself." Some women don't find mini-skirts to be immodest frankly. It is so ironic that that women are blamed for the actions of selfish, self-serving, base, and immoral men because of the way that they dress when it is men who dictate to those women what is desirable to begin with. Additionally, there are places in this world where a woman can be following the highest code of "modesty" and she will still suffer sexual assault. And she will be blamed. It isn't about the clothes, it isn't about the location. It is about how we view each other. Men that assault women no matter the location or the clothing involved do not see another human being. They see something to have power over, something to relieve themselves in. It has nothing to do with mini-skirts. It has everything do do with seeing women as human beings. I have had many experiences where I have been completely modest, we're talking Strength of Youth pamphlet, Molly Mormon modest and had men blatantly undress me with their eyes. I'm very athletically built. I'm not particularly curvy in any way. It's not about the way women are dressing and to boil such an important issue down to mini-skirts is to simply give in to the culture that this blog posts suggest that we fight together. A culture where there is no responsibility on the part of men in regards to their own morality if a mini-skirt is present.






Smashed it. 

Thursday, January 24, 2013

Morning thoughts

I hate eye shadow lately. Whether or not this stems from my severe case of PMS or the fact that life has just been rough lately I don't know. But I just want to wear mascara and not deal with all these colors and the shading and bla bla bla.

I have a thoughtful boss who called me to tell me that the roads were beyond iced over and that I should just work from home this morning and come in after it had warmed up a bit. This was appreciated as I was going to be late this morning anyways.

I wonder if I will get to see the String Bean today. Haven't seen much of him this week. Not loving the whole living 20 minutes apart and him taking 14 credits thing. But whatevs. I get to watch more TV.

I struggled to get dressed this morning and still am not loving the outfit... I don't want to get out of this warm bed, put on heels and go to the office.

I took ZZZquil last night. Half a dose, and I still have a hangover.

SLEEEEEEEEEEEEEP. LET ME SLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEP.


GNC

Thursday, January 17, 2013

The one where I spill it all. Well, most.

I will have you know I am officially writing this on my phone as I commute home. Not going to lie, it's a bit of a killer. The commute there isn't as bad - I walk about a mile downhill, metro for 15 minutes, walk another 10 and I'm there. It's really only 10 minutes longer than my commute when I lived at the Barlow. However, remember that hill? Yeah, that hill REALLY sucks to walk back up after working for 10 hours in heels, ESPECIALLY when that work includes guiding interns on 2 hour-long tours of the Capitol and running errands. I'm seriously considering either moving or driving to work if I fin a permanent position on or around the hill, particularly if I join the House gym like I plan, because then I'll be there even longer as well as be more tired and sore on the way home.

Oh well. Those are thoughts for another time :)

I feel the need to share a rather disturbing/wonderful fact: today is Thursday. The last time I showered was Monday. In all fairness, you couldn't tell if you looked at or smelled me. See, the weather here has been incredibly rainy and humid, so I haven't been able to straighten or curl my hair. I've just left it natural, with a little bit of mouse and gel in it to stop it from staging a coupe and forcefully taking over the space usually occupied by my head. And when I do my hair like that it almost never looks greasy. Ever. So I've just been doing it a series of ways. Day 1 it was down; day 2 it was half-up. Day 3 loosely French-braided with curls framing my face. Day 4 (today) pulled back with a series of bobby-pins and corn-rowed. And actually, the greasier it gets, the less frizzy it is. It's a win-win!

Also: The Guru survived 3 days in a car with me while I was sleep-deprived, stressed, AND PRE-MENSTRUAL. I think we both deserve awards; he for not making me kill him, and me for controlling myself and not actually killing him. I'm actually rather excited for when he moves out here. I can foresee us having some fun times.

Now for the interns. (I saved this for last as I knew this was re only reason you read this entry.) we'll call the first one FOH, short for Full of Himself. I mean, I get it kid, you've already graduated from college and been accepted to some very prestigious law schools. However, you're still an unpaid intern. It's not your place to constantly correct your fellow intern while he's giving a tour, nor do you have to explain every piece of your logic to explain to us why you're not wrong when we give you constructive criticism. WE DON'T CARE. Nor do we care how well you handled this constituent phone call. We're not here ro be your personal validator. So please do not interupt us from the work we're doing so you can te us a story and have us pat you on the head. You're still wrong, we're still right. I don't care if you think you're smarter or more qualified than we are. The fact is, we're still your supervisors, so suck it up and at least pretend to be teachable. If this is how you are as an intern, I'd hate to see how you would be as a staffer when you actually have a little bit of authority.

The other one we'll refer to as Churchmouse. He is referred to this way because of how incredibly timid he is as well as the fact I get the impression he's a little poor. I say this because I think I've only seen him wear that one shirt (more on that later). He too is a college graduate, except unlike FOH he is super passive and almost never volunteers any information about himself, his life, etc. I think he's living in a hostel somewhere in Virginia or the NW because I think I saw him riding the Blue line home. ...though in all fairness it was before L'Enfant, so really he could be living anywhere... That is all mostly irrelevant, of course. My biggest complaint about Churchmouse is that his timidity can be a huge hindrance in the learning process, especially as he has a tendency to take certain tasks too seriously and get overwhelmed easily. And I feel very empathetic as I had a tendency to be that way for the first month or so of my internship. Clearly I'm fine now, heck, I ran my own damn campaign office and did ALL the phone answering there! I just wish I could tell him how to skip that horrible part where you feel like you're failing and jump to the successful part.

My other frustration with Churchmouse is one I've shared with The Rack already and deals with that one shirt. And possibly the fact that he lives in a hostel.

He smells. Pretty horribly. That's not to say he's always smelled. In fact, I didn't notice it until the very end of Tuesday. By the end of Wednesday it was bad enough to exacerbate the menstrual natural migraine I had coming on. Today it was a pretty constant BO presence with accentuated whiffs whenever he moved. It's incredibly frustrating, because I can only imagine how it's going to be tomorrow.

Needless to say, I do not have my own desk, but am squished in the hallway with the interns. Not that anyone really gets any space, but still.

I am, however, working with education policy, which makes me incredibly happy. I love doing this kind of research into what would be best for my district as well as the country as a whole. Plus it's exposing me to previous legislation, possible solutions, and pros and cons of those solutions. It's fascinating and incredibly intimidating. And infinitely more interesting than sorting news articles.

There is obviously more about my life here that I want to share with you ladies. Also, you should probably call me at your girls night tomorrow.

But I'll leave you with this tidbit. Guru was in my dream last night. And there was some lip-loving.

Toodles!

-Paul Mitchell